Financial Consumer Protection under the Unfair Contract Terms


IT has been long recognised under consumer protection law that unfair contract terms should be strictly prohibited due to the unequal bargaining power between the financial institutions and the consumer. Furthermore, in 2018 case of CIMB Bank Berhad v Anthony Lawrence Bourke and Anor [2018] 1 LNS 1887, Malaysian Federal Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that commercial bank

cannot reply on exclusion clauses that restrain legal proceedings, contravening to section 29 of the Contracts Act 1950.

Get 30% off with our ads free Premium Plan!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM9.73 only

Billed as RM9.73 for the 1st month then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month
RM8.63/month

Billed as RM103.60 for the 1st year then RM148 thereafters.

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

consumer , protection , law , unfair , contract

   

Next In Letters

Vital to invest more in preschool teachers
Stop these crimes against humanity
We need a broader definition of e-commerce
A call for intellectual civility
Adopt pragmatic approach on MAHB
Longing to see Jalur Gemilang at Parliament building
Ban import of plastic and e-waste immediately
Transforming Malaysian education
Get the aero train fixed already
Reducing heavy vehicle road accidents

Others Also Read