Protesters shouting slogans during a rally alleging widespread fraud in the Feb 14 presidential. — AFP/AP
A court rejected in full a challenge from losing candidate Anies Baswedan seeking a rerun of February’s presidential election and the disqualification of winner Prabowo Subianto and his running mate.
The Constitutional Court ruled that there was no evidence of systematic fraud and presidential “meddling”, nor that state bodies, regional officials and social assistance had been mobilised to sway polls in the world’s third largest democracy.
“The plaintiff’s petition has no legal basis in its entirety,” said Chief Justice Suhartoyo, announcing the decision.
Five judges ruled in favour of rejecting the petition, with three dissenting opinions, he said.
Losing presidential candidates Anies and Ganjar Pranowo have both separately alleged there was state interference to favour Defence Minister Prabowo, who won by a huge margin, and had complained his running mate, the current president’s 36-year-old son, should not have been allowed to take part.
The administration and Prabowo had rejected the allegations.
Unhappy lot: Anies (left) and his running mate Muhaimin Iskandar reacting as the judges read out their decision. — AFP/AP
The judges are expected to read their decision on Ganjar’s petition later.
The rivals of former special forces commander Prabowo had sought his disqualification, arguing the government’s widespread distribution of social aid, including handouts of rice, cash and fertiliser, in key areas had swayed the vote in his favour.
Cabinet members in court denied that the aid swayed voters and Prabowo, who won 58% of the vote, has dismissed the claim as baseless.
Judge Saldi Isra, who cast one of three dissenting votes yesterday, agreed that social assistance had been wielded for electoral advantage and argued for a revote in some areas.
“Based on the legal and factual consideration, the distribution of social aid... for electoral gains cannot be disregarded at all,” he said.
Anies and Ganjar, who won about 25% and 16% of votes respectively, had also alleged that tacit support from the hugely popular President Joko Widodo, better known as Jokowi, had gifted Prabowo an unfair advantage.
Jokowi came under intense scrutiny in the election run-up, with critics alleging he abused his position to favour Prabowo, with the aim of preserving his legacy after a decade in charge of South-East Asia’s biggest economy.
The losing candidates also complained to the Constitutional Court about the inclusion of Jokowi’s son Gibran Rakabuming Raka as Prabowo’s running mate, which was enabled by a decision in October by the same court to change eligibility rules.
The chief justice at the time was Jokowi’s brother-in-law, who was later reprimanded by an ethics panel for allowing intervention from an unspecified “external party”. He was barred from involvement in election-related cases.
Despite the ethical violation, the judges said there was no evidence of nepotism or presidential intervention in relation to that decision. — Reuters
