FILE PHOTO: A help wanted sign at a store along Queen Street West in Toronto Ontario, Canada June 10, 2022. REUTERS/Carlos Osorio/File Photo
TORONTO: At a time industrialised countries around the world are confronting declining birth rates and ageing workforces, Canada is at the forefront of betting on immigration to stave off economic decline.
A country about as populous as California has added more than all the residents in San Francisco in a year. Last week, Canada surpassed 40 million people for the first time ever – with growth only expected to continue at a rapid pace as it welcomes more immigrant workers, refugees and foreign students across its borders.
For Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s administration, the massive immigration experiment is a way to broaden the labour market as global competition for skilled workers intensifies.
It also reflects a longer-term ambition for Canada to expand its international presence and emerge from the shadow of the neighbouring United States – similar in size by land, but home to about eight times the population and almost 12 times the gross domestic product (GDP).
“We have lots of space for people to come and occupy,” said Usha George, a professor in Canadian immigration policy at Toronto Metropolitan University.
“In order to expand our agricultural, industrial and technological base, we need more people to come here.”
Now, as people flow into the country like never before, Canada has an immediate challenge: how to propel growth in rural regions in dire need of newcomers while minimising the strains to urban centres already bulging with people.
The rewards are apparent. Population gains have boosted hiring and consumption, helping the economy withstand a rate-hike campaign by the Bank of Canada – so much so that the central bank this month had to resume tightening after a pause.
Yet in a country that’s long been home to one of the world’s hottest housing markets, the government’s plan has drawn criticism that increasing immigration targets merely boosts economic output without raising living standards for individuals.
Real GDP per capita has been little changed over the past decade, and is expected to fall from its 2022 peak, based on Bank of Canada output forecasts.
Productivity growth has been stagnant, and disposable income hasn’t kept up with home prices.
Even some prominent, pro-immigration economists are now saying Canada is going too far, too fast.
“It doesn’t make sense in this very short period of time to make such a rapid increase,” said David Dodge, a former Bank of Canada governor who decades ago worked on a system that’s a genesis of the current immigration program.
“The speed of that adjustment exacerbates the costs and reduces the additional productivity because there’s less time for people to get adjusted.”
Fastest growth
The Trudeau administration has set a target of adding about half a million permanent residents each year.
Last year, foreign students, temporary workers and refugees made up another group that’s even larger, bringing total arrivals to a record one million.
The inflow pushed Canada’s annual population growth rate to 2.7%, the fastest pace among advanced economies and rivaling developing nations Burkina Faso, Burundi and Sudan.
“You have to realise that if you don’t embrace immigration, there are whole hosts of social and economic consequences that will impact your community negatively,” Sean Fraser, Canada’s immigration minister, said in an interview.
“The ability to successfully integrate people in large numbers doesn’t demand that you welcome fewer people, it demands that you advance smart immigration policies.”
Nearly one in four people in Canada are now immigrants, the largest proportion among the Group of Seven (G7) nations. At the current pace of growth, the smallest G7 country by population would double its residents in about 26 years, and surpass Italy, France, the United Kingdom and Germany by 2050.
The looming threats of an ageing population – leading to dwindling tax revenue and shrinking budgets – are playing out in different ways around the world.
France’s plan to raise the retirement age by two years to 64 led to nationwide protests.
Germany risks having five million fewer workers by the end of the decade, and already is struggling with strains in its industrial-heavy economy.
Japan, where the government has long resisted immigration, is facing acute labour shortages, a rapid population decline, and dying rural towns.
In the United States, immigration is a divisive political issue that’s becoming even more polarising as thousands of migrants traverse the Mexican border daily.
By contrast, Canada’s residents have long been welcoming of newcomers, thanks to the country’s framing of immigration as an economic policy and a relatively isolated geography that limits illegal crossings.
Since 1967, it has relied on a system where immigrants are assigned points based on their age, education, employment opportunities and English or French abilities, allowing the country to target skilled workers.
But immigration has largely tilted toward Canada’s larger cities, which have developed strong ethnic communities that have in turn attracted more newcomers seeking a sense of belonging.
Over a one-year period to July 1, the largest population centres had a net gain of more than 600,000 people from international migration, compared with just 21,000 settling in smaller communities.
That’s only strengthened real estate demand in cities where housing was already in short supply, raising homeownership barriers and pricing millions out of the market – hurting both international migrants and current residents, especially younger generations.
“We’re a free country. We’re not going to direct migration patterns to say you have to move to remote places,” said Bob Dhillon, founder and chief executive officer of Calgary-based real estate company Mainstreet Equity Corp, who’s a Sikh immigrant.
“But we can encourage new immigrants and give them incentives to go to different parts of Canada other than big cities.”
His city exemplifies some of the strains. Even after a rise in interest rates last year, a benchmark measure of Calgary home values climbed almost 3% in May from a year earlier to a record. Prices are up almost 28% from just five years ago.
That’s in part because of a sudden surge in residents in Calgary’s home province of Alberta: Last year’s 3.7% jump in population – matching the pace of Niger, the world’s fastest-growing country – was unexpected even for a region known for its oil boomtowns.
Mortgage broker Matt Leggett said he has never seen this much housing demand since moving to Calgary nearly two decades ago.
Leslie Echino, owner of Annabelle’s Kitchen, has spent months looking to add a third location in one of the city’s fast-growing suburbs, but newly empty commercial spaces are usually snapped up within days.
Rental-property builder Bucci Developments went from offering a month of free rent two years ago to now having a wait list for its units. The company is trying to catch up with soaring demand, doubling its construction target with plans to add four more towers near downtown.
“It’s these unexpected surges that force us to retool,” said Mike Bucci, the company’s vice-president. “I want boring predictability. If you’re consistent, the industry can catch up. But it’s going to take us at least three years to do so,” he said, referring to the time it takes his firm to build an apartment building.
Those type of real estate shocks risk eroding support among Canadians for immigrants, said David Green, a professor at the University of British Columbia’s Vancouver School of Economics.
“We’re opening the door to the same kind of problems that we see in other countries,” Green said.
“The hard-right wing is going to pick this up and run with it, and at least a modicum of what they’re going to say on the housing market strains is going to be true. That’s going to give credence to the rest of their narrative. This is a very dangerous game.”
Canadian values
Fraser, the immigration minister, said the government is trying to address the strains with measures such as regionalising immigration programmes to allocate people to areas that have more capacity, and a programme to bring in more people who have skills that are in great demand, such as health-care workers and homebuilders.
“This is going to help us bring the skills that we need into the economy to help alleviate some of the social pressures rather than exacerbate them,” he said.
Public support also is holding strong. Canadians look at immigration “as a value and not a policy,” said Andrew Parkin, executive director of the Environics Institute for Survey Research, which conducts an annual survey on the subject.
In the most recent one, almost 70% of respondents said they disagree with the statement “overall, there is too much immigration to Canada,” the highest since the poll began in 1977.
Among the 27% of survey respondents who agreed there’s too much immigration, the most common reason they gave was a threat to culture.
Concerns about the changing demographic are playing out in Quebec, Canada’s second-most populous province. The French-speaking region has resisted raising its permanent resident targets, keeping the pace at just half that of the federal government on a per capita basis.
Premier François Legault has said that the province wouldn’t accept large increases of newcomers like the rest of the country on concern it would lead to a decline in French language, even though that could mean further losing its demographic weight within Canada.
At the same time, industry groups have repeatedly called for higher immigration to add more permanent workers to the economy. Quebec businesses are increasingly turning to temporary staff to fill jobs, with the number of temporary foreign workers jumping 65% in just three years.
Across all provinces, many accreditation and job processes can’t expand fast enough to cope with or take advantage of the rapid increases in newcomers.
That has resulted in many skilled immigrants being forced to work at entry levels or wait around for their foreign qualifications to be recognised.
More than half of recent immigrants were admitted under the economic category – meaning skilled workers and entrepreneurs who are “selected on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada.”
While these people are a key focus of the policy, alongside refugee resettlement, the number of temporary workers has soared in recent years, leading to criticism that they will hurt wage growth and increase income inequality.
But both high and low-skilled jobs are needed throughout Canada, where the job market remains tight. The “vast majority” of immigrants are contributing to the economy, said Kevin McNichol, CEO of Prospect Human Services, which helps Albertans and newcomers get jobs.
“This isn’t a deficit game,” he said. “They’re not taking stuff away. They’re adding, and in adding then our economy grows for everybody, which means more work, more jobs, more money.”
Embracing change
Those types of benefits are becoming clear in Nova Scotia, which knows the pains of a shrinking population.
Up until about a decade ago, communities were slowly dying after key industries like steelmaking and coal mining shut down, taking working-age people with them.
They left behind an older population and towns that struggled to support themselves.
The biggest Atlantic province now wants to double its residents to two million by 2060 – an ambitious target considering it took more than 150 years for Nova Scotia to reach a million people, in 2021.
In Pictou County, where Fraser is from, the influx of foreign business owners, healthcare professionals and factory workers have changed the area dramatically.
In less than a decade, the county added a mosque, Syrian restaurants and an Asian grocery store. It’s also getting a Mexican restaurant later this year, to be run by former temporary worker Anabel Cameron.
“We as Canadians have a very wealthy neighbour to the south of us, and we want all the things that they want, but their population and tax base allow them to have really good roads, really good services and all these wonderful things,” said Jim Fitt, founder and CEO of Velsoft, an e-learning and training software company based in the county, which relies on immigrants to help serve its clients worldwide.
“The only way we’re going to be able to achieve that is if we have a bigger tax base.” — Bloomberg
