AT the What Works at Work Summit organised by the Philippine Daily Inquirer last Monday, I moderated a panel discussion entitled Wellness and Well-being: Enhancing Mental Health, Pay, and Happiness in the Workplace.
I noted how they explicitly included pay, compensation and benefits in the discussion. This speaks to a growing awareness that mental health isn’t siloed from financial aspects of work and life.
Financial stress is a significant source of distress for many and is interrelated with job stress and marital or relationship stress.
In other words, money issues can impact many areas of our lives, leading to unhappiness and poor mental health. Moreover, a recent study by Purdue University has claimed that Filipino families need 130,000 peso a month to be happy.
This is a tall order, given that the Philippine Statistics Authority has estimated the average income of Filipino families at 29,436 peso a month (or 353,230 peso a year).
Our average family income stands at roughly 15,000 peso more than the poverty threshold – the minimum income required for a family to meet the basic food and non-food requirements – of 13,873 peso.
The average Filipino family may not be poor, but it doesn’t make them comfortable. So, can money buy happiness? We have heard the old adage, “Money can’t buy happiness.”
However, the economic reality of Filipinos seems to indicate that money can go a long way in helping us achieve a comfortable life, if not ultimate happiness.
I was asked by a reporter recently whether people will still struggle with happiness even when they achieve 130,000 peso per month as described by the Purdue study.
The distribution of wealth in our country is so lopsided that I feel the reporter’s feared scenario may only apply to the very few.
What is more pressing for the majority of Filipinos is how to secure financial stability so they can even begin to think about other ways of pursuing happiness.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs describes how we prioritise more fundamental and basic needs over “higher” needs like knowledge and aesthetics.
More importantly, he states that one cannot pursue higher needs until one’s more basic needs have been fulfilled.
The hierarchy goes as follows: physiological needs (food, water, shelter), safety needs (safety, security), love and belonging (family, friends), esteem (respect, recognition, self-esteem), and growth needs (cognitive, aesthetic, self-actualisation).
Based on this hierarchy, we can see how money can significantly address the first two basic needs. The monthly food threshold stands at around 64 peso per person, with the cost of basic food needs making up 70% of the poverty threshold.
This does not even include housing, which is another basic need. With rising food and housing costs, our bar for happiness also increases as we need to focus on earning more before we can give space for our other needs.
Safety is another basic need.
Financial security is essential to feeling safe in the modern world. It costs money to live in a safe neighbourhood.
We only need to look at disaster-prone areas and see how there is a glaring socio-economic disparity in who faces the brunt of typhoons, floods and fires.
Rich people can afford to move to safer places; the poor do not have that luxury. The rich can also afford to put up walls, set up gates, hire guards, and keep people out.
Ideally, our physical safety should be our government’s priority via police enforcement, but we also see how their protection is unevenly distributed.
The next level of need is love and belonging. We can only attend fully to our relationships and connections once we feel safe.
I remember when we asked netizens as to their reasons for not dating and a lot of them cited that dating is too expensive.
They would rather focus their money on more basic needs rather than spend it on a relationship. Some even felt that they don’t deserve a relationship if they cannot yet afford one.
Money – or the lack of it – can intrude even in our relationships. The younger generation have become increasingly practical about love and relationships, with not a few deciding early on not to have children due to not being able to afford caring for them.
Even when encouraged to think of ways to date that do not cost money, most have the long-term in mind and do not see the point of starting a relationship if they cannot financially provide for a future family, thereby going back to more basic needs in the hierarchy.
It stands to reason that money helps to enhance our mental health too, which is related to both safety needs (as in psychological safety) and esteem needs (as in our sense of self-worth).
The lack of economic stability that can fulfil our basic needs can lead us to not feel safe in our environment and make us hesitate to nurture connections that can be a source of support.
Money is not the sole factor for happiness. But it does facilitate many of our needs that then will allow us to pursue happiness freely. — Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Anna Cristina Tuazon is a columnist for the Philippine Daily Inquirer. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.
