UK weighs making Netflix users pay a licence fee to fund the BBC


Ministers are also looking at tiering the licence fee to ensure lower-income households don’t pay the same rate as more affluent users. — Bloomberg

LONDON: The United Kingdom is considering making households who only use streaming services such as Netflix and Disney pay the British Broadcasting Corp (BBC) licence fee, as part of plans to modernise the way it funds the public-service broadcaster.

Extending the fee to streaming applications is on a menu of options being discussed by Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s office, the Treasury and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be named discussing internal government deliberations.

Alternatives under discussion include allowing the BBC to use advertising, imposing a specific tax on streaming services and asking those who listen to BBC radio to pay a fee.

The government is in the early stages of examining how to overhaul the funding of Britain’s public broadcaster when its current 11-year charter ends on Dec 31, 2027.

Ministers are looking to either retain and alter the current television licence fee model or scrap it and instead fund the BBC through alternative models such as taxation or subscription.

That’s because viewing habits have changed as users gravitate toward on-demand services.

The talks are sensitive because the United Kingdom’s national broadcaster is often viewed as a key vehicle for the country’s soft power around the world.

TRANSFORMATIVE IMPACT OF A UK EDUCATION

But the BBC – which is committed to maintaining impartiality in its editorial output – also frequently faces criticisms of bias from both the left and right of the country’s political spectrum.

Another option is to leave the licence fee largely as it is, with a few tweaks, a continuation of uprating, and better enforcement, a person familiar with the internal deliberations said.

If there were an obvious alternative model, the licence fee would have been scrapped already, they added.

Government discussions remain preliminary and nothing has been decided, the people said.

A spokesperson for the DCMS said in a statement that they wouldn’t comment on “speculation” adding: “We will provide more details about charter review plans in due course.”

The licence fee dates back to 1946, when consumers watched programmes at the time of broadcast. It currently costs households who watch live television or use BBC iPlayer £169.50 a year, an amount that usually rises annually with inflation.

Even if they don’t watch BBC programmes, households are required to hold a television licence to view or stream programs live on sites including YouTube and Amazon Prime Video.

However it’s not needed by those who only watch on-demand, non-BBC content.

Licence fee income in 2023/2024 totalled £3.66bil, little more than the £3.51bil raised in 2010/2011, according to government data. While expanding the fee to cover streaming services would address the shift from linear viewing to video-on-demand, it also risks a backlash from consumers who already pay subscriptions for the same services.

“Forcing streaming service users to cough up the license fee would truly be one of the most bonkers ideas ever concocted,” said TaxPayers’ Alliance chief executive John O’Connell, a pressure group that campaigns for lower taxes.

“Far from modernising the BBC’s funding system, it would only further entrench the already archaic nature of the hated television tax.”

A YouGov poll commissioned for the Sunday Times found that 36% of voters favour abolishing the license fee and funding the BBC through general taxation, with 49% opposed.

Other options under consideration include: imposing a specific tax on streaming; asking people who listen to BBC radio to also pay the licence fee; and making users of the BBC’s on-demand app pay a subscription fee rather than the licence.

Additionally, mirroring the business model of services like Netflix, Disney, Amazon Prime and Apple TV.

Ministers are also looking at tiering the licence fee to ensure lower-income households don’t pay the same rate as more affluent users.

“We want everyone to get value from the BBC,” the BBC said in a statement.

“We look forward to engaging with the government on the next charter and securing the long term future of the BBC.”

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told BBC TV earlier this month that she has “already started initial discussions with the BBC leadership about the charter review” and hopes to “future proof our national broadcaster until well into the latter half of this century”.

Nandy later clarified that funding the BBC through general taxation is “not something we’re considering” after the Sunday Times reported that she had looked at that option.

Furthermore, the newspaper reported that her preferred option was to abolish the licence fee and that she wants to turn the BBC into a mutual organisation to give direct control and ownership to the public.

Such a move would allow the government to address the rising fee evasion rate, which reached a high of 10.3% in 2022 to 2023, according to a House of Commons report.

The BBC estimated that every percentage point reduction in the evasion rate amounts to an extra £43mil of revenue, the report said.

Separately, Nandy has described the licence fee as “insufficient” and “deeply regressive”, pointing to the number of women who are prosecuted for being unable to pay it, and its flat fee which means poorer people pay proportionately more than others. — Bloomberg

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Others Also Read


Want to listen to full audio?

Unlock unlimited access to enjoy personalise features on the TheStar.com.my

Already a member? Log In