Do you really need a stent?


A still of an angiogram showing where the right coronary artery is blocked in a heart attack patient. While unstable CAD patients, like this one, require an intervention, those with stable disease do just as well on medication. — Dr Timothy Watson

The cardiology world is abuzz with the revelation of yet another clinical trial that has shown no added advantage with balloon angioplasty, compared to optimal medical therapy, in the treatment of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

After a decade of study, the results of the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (Ischemia) Trial were revealed at the American Heart Association Scientific Meeting 2019 in mid-November.

Subscribe or renew your subscriptions to win prizes worth up to RM68,000!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.

Heart disease , heart attack , stents , angiogram

   

Next In Health

Local study finds fermented soybean can improve gut health
This seasonal infection can be potentially deadly
Playing video games can help to heal mental traumas
Pneumonia is killing our people so let's step up and fight against it
Hysterectomy is not the only way to treat fibroids
Oximeter readings on darker skin people not accurate
Is bulking up to build muscles safe for teens?
Does taking vitamin C when you're sick really work?
Why rescue blankets have a silver and a gold side
'Engage your core!' – but how do you really do that?

Others Also Read