Some 80% of people displaced by climate change are women and girls, heightening risks of human trafficking and other abuses.
AS global climate negotiators seek to eke out progress, participants say they are witnessing backsliding in one unexpected area – gender.
Previous climate summits, like many United Nations (UN) events, have spoken routinely of the need to involve women, who studies say are facing a disproportionate burden from the planet’s rising temperatures and disasters.
But at COP29 in Azerbaijan, a draft proposal was stripped in negotiations of references to the experience of women and even of the word “diversity”, Ireland’s first female president, Mary Robinson, who has been in Baku for the talks, told AFP.
Saudi Arabia has been the key force in opposing gender language and has enjoyed support from Russia, which speaks of promoting traditional values, Robinson and other participants say.
After years of attempts, the opponents of gender language feel “emboldened” now, says Robinson.
“I think they’ve got a sense of entitlement to do it now, because gender is going backwards. There’s a backlash against gender in the United States, for example, and in parts of Europe where you have right-wing governance,” says Robinson, who has also served as the UN human rights commissioner and helped form a group of veteran leaders known as The Elders.
A draft text circulated at COP29, where the top priority was ramping up money to the hardest-hit countries, has maintained one reference to gender, saying that climate finance must be “human rights-based and gender-responsive”.
More concretely, COP29 was to decide on a proposal to extend by another 10 years an initiative established in 2014 in Lima to incorporate gender systematically in policy work of the UN climate body.
Opponents have refrained from openly campaigning against the gender language, but a Saudi official speaking on behalf of the Arab Group at COP29 said that human rights matters were “not relevant” to climate finance.
“The final decision must be short, concise and crisp,” Albara Tawfiq told delegates.
Decisions at UN climate conferences need to be reached by consensus, although the meaning of consensus is debated.
‘Not so normal anymore’
Some 80% of people displaced by climate change are women and girls, heightening risks of human trafficking and other abuses, according to a United Nations study.
Yet policymakers are overwhelmingly men. At last year’s COP28 in Dubai, which activists credited with forward movement on gender, 34% of delegates were women, according to the Women’s Environment and Development Organisation.
At a UN-themed gender day at the conference, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock brought together fellow female envoys at COP29 for a group photo.
“Normally this is just a normal given thing, but we have realised – not only at this COP, also before, but especially at this COP – that somehow normal things are not so normal anymore,” she says.
Pointing to climate change’s effect on women, Baerbock urges a renewal of the Lima programme and language on gender.
“Fighting the climate crisis, it needs female power, it needs women power, and we can only fight the climate crisis together,” she says.
Ayshka Najib, a feminist climate activist at COP29, says the Azerbaijani hosts did not make gender a priority but credited pressure with restoring some limited language.
“This COP was meant to be as much a gender cap as it is a finance COP, yet what we are witnessing is not progress, but an alarming backslide on gender across agenda items,” she says.
Canada’s climate negotiator, Catherine Stewart, says preserving a focus on gender was bowing to reality.
“We are concerned,” she said. “A text that brings us back 10 years is unacceptable.” – AFP