Time to talk peace?


Sign of the times: A road sign in the United States converted to a call for peace, with the colours of the Ukrainian flag. — AP

ON March 7, Russia stated three aims for its invasion of Ukraine: official Ukrainian neutrality, recognition of Russian sovereignty over Crimea, and recognition of the independence of pro-Russian separatist regions in Luhansk and Donetsk.

The United States and Nato (the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) have not spoken publicly about a final diplomatic settlement, and with President Volodymyr Zelen-skyy’s government focused on maintaining national unity and armed resistance to Russia, Ukraine has publicly stated its positions only in somewhat contradictory bits and pieces. But Zelenskyy, in consultation with the United States and Europe, which are backing Ukraine’s war-fighting capacity, should formulate and state what a reasonable peace settlement would look like.

Subscribe now and receive FREE sooka plan for 1 month.
T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Focus

US: 'Malaysia will be a capable Asean chair'
Bitter truth behind the sugar industry
Tragedy sparks reflection
Joyful guardians of Hudson Bay
Nailing the art of protest
Of keris and traditional medicine
Holding on in the face of decline
A town shattered by gang violence
Africa’s timeless trees are thriving
When war shockwaves hit home

Others Also Read