The power station below the upper dam of the Bull Run watershed east of Portland. Oregon’s Bull Run rainforest does not get water from the Columbia River. But a severe wildfire like one last summer could force officials to shut down the dams and stop drawing water from Bull Run. — Photos: ©️2024 The New York Times Company
IN February, the United States did something that it had not done in many years – the country sent more electricity to Canada than it received from its northern neighbour.
Then, in March, US electricity exports to Canada climbed even more, reaching their highest level since at least 2010.
The increasing flow of power north is part of a worrying trend for North America: demand for energy is growing robustly everywhere, but the supply of power – in Canada’s case from giant hydroelectric dams – and the ability to get the energy to where it’s needed are increasingly under strain.
Many energy experts say Canadian hydroelectric plants, which have had to reduce electricity production because of a recent drop in rain and snow, will eventually bounce back.
But some industry executives are worried that climate change, which has already been linked to the explosive wildfires in Canada last year, could make it harder to predict when rain and snowfall will return to normal.
“We’ve all got to be humble in the face of more extreme weather,” said Chris O’Riley, president and CEO of the British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, which operates hydroelectric dams in western Canada.
“We manage from year to year the ups and downs of water, and when we have the downs like we’re having, the lower levels, it’s common for us to import power, and we expect to continue that this year.”
The United States and Canada have long relied on each other because power use tends to peak north of the border during the winter when Canadians use electric heaters, and American electricity use peaks in the summer during air-conditioning season.
The abundance of Canada’s hydroelectric power has been a cornerstone of the trade, providing relatively low-cost renewable energy to California, Oregon, Washington state, New York state and New England.
But the supply-and-demand equation for energy is changing. Demand for electricity in many US states has been climbing sharply in summer and winter. Some experts predict that winter electricity demand in the United States could eclipse summer demand by 2050.
At the same time, utilities are increasingly reliant on intermittent resources such as solar and wind power.
Large hydroelectric plants, once considered a stable source of electricity, have struggled with low reservoirs in California, around Hoover Dam and recently in Canada.
“We are facing real changes in the weather, and we’re finding out in real time how that’s going to affect hydroelectric operations, pretty much across North America,” said Robert McCullough of McCullough Research, a firm based in Portland, Oregon, who has been a consultant for corporate customers of Canadian utilities since the 1980s.
Anna Buckley, left, the watershed’s protection manager, and Sarah Santner, the resource protection and planning director, visiting an area damaged by a wildfire at the Bull Run watershed east of Portland.
In addition, electricity use is expected to climb as people and businesses turn to electric heat pumps, cars and industrial equipment to replace devices that burn oil, natural gas and coal. Demand is also growing because of data centres.
One solution is to build more power lines, something the Biden administration and some states are working on. But energy experts say the United States also ought to add more such connections to Canada.
That would allow, for example, solar farms in California to supply Canada when its dams don’t have enough water and for Canadian utilities to send more power south when they have an abundance.
“Most models suggest that a more interconnected grid is a better grid,” said Shelley Welton, a presidential distinguished professor at the University of Pennsylvania who helped write a recent report on electric grid reliability and governance.
“I do think there is power in being interconnected across North America. We need scenario planning. We need long-term planning.”
Set among the pine and spruce trees of northern Quebec, the Robert-Bourassa hydroelectric dam represents the promises and challenges inherent in harnessing renewable energy.
The Robert-Bourassa Generating Station in northern Quebec.
The plant’s operator, Hydro-Quebec, a utility owned by the Canadian province, built the power plant on a bank of La Grande River as part of a network of stations that can produce more than twice as much electricity as the largest US power plant – the Grand Coulee Dam on the Columbia River in Washington state.
The La Grande complex has helped Hydro-Quebec become a leading supplier to New York state and New England. But less snow than normal has forced Hydro-Quebec and other Canadian utilities to import more power from the United States in recent months.
“It looks like conditions are abnormally dry,” said Gilbert Bennett, president of Water Power Canada, a non-profit that represents the hydropower industry. “The year-to-year variations are becoming large.”
Hydro-Quebec executives say they expect the dry spell to end soon, citing similar stretches in 2004 and 2014. Models predict an increase in precipitation of 6% to 8% for eastern Canada over the next 25 years, the company said.
Serge Abergel, chief operating officer for Hydro-Quebec Energy Services, said Canada’s greater reliance on the United States had been a temporary way for hydro plants to save their water.
He added that as both countries modernised and expanded their grids with more renewable and efficient resources, they would be able to complement each other.
“The transition is also creating opportunities,” Abergel said during a recent tour of the Robert-Bourassa dam. “You optimise these resources.”
Some of the underground Robert-Bourassa Generating Station in northern Quebec.
In general, the United States would prefer to import more power from Canada because it’s much cheaper.
Hydro-Quebec’s residential customers pay about US$50 (RM236) for 1,000 kilowatt-hours of energy, Abergel said, compared with US$236 (RM1,112) in New York state and US$276 (RM1,300) on average in New England.
The company’s costs are low because its hydro plants were built and paid off long ago. But bringing that affordable power south is expensive – Canadian hydro energy costs homeowners in Massachusetts twice as much as it does residents of Quebec, according to an analysis by McCullough Research.
Lower-than-normal rain and snow have reduced Canada’s hydropower production, raising worries in the industry about the effects of climate change.
Hydro-Quebec has been building more power lines. It is taking part in one project, the Champlain Hudson Power Express, which is expected to be completed by mid-2026.
The US$6bil, roughly 500km-long transmission line will connect a substation in La Prairie, near Montreal, to a converter station in the Astoria neighbourhood of New York City’s Queens borough. The line will be able to deliver enough energy to serve more than a million homes in New York City.
“If you want to transition quickly, you need more transmission,” Abergel said. But “we’re not incentivising someone to come up with solutions,” he added. “We’re doing things piecemeal.” — ©️2024 The New York Times Company
