THE United States-brokered ceasefire appears to be dead as all indications are that Israel’s genocidal Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is setting conditions that Hamas will find impossible to accept, such as a continued Israeli military presence in Gaza.
The main pressure for a peace deal is coming from the Biden administration, which in its final months in office wants some sort of foreign policy success on its report card that may also boost the chances of Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential race. But as committed as the US administration is to supporting Israel come what may, it is not clear what leverage it may have in order to exert pressure on Tel Aviv to agree to a deal acceptable to all parties. So far, billions of dollars of military supplies such as bombs, missiles and equipment are flowing freely from the US to Israel. It is abundantly clear that that lever will not be used.
So far, of the over 40,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza since October last year, some 14,000 are children. The number of wounded children, which include many multiple amputees, is no less. An even greater tragedy is reflected in the term ‘wounded child with no surviving family’.
Images of Palestinian children murdered in the most brutal of ways land in the US via social media and sections of the traditional media every day, every hour but even those horrific photos and footage do not seem to move the political decision-makers.
Israel’s scorched earth military campaign that has destroyed most of Gaza and its infrastructure, including the water/power supply system, roads, schools, universities and many hospitals besides thousands of homes, has not drawn any adverse reaction from the US, UK, Germany and other Western powers.
In fact, the US and Germany have tried hard to use law-enforcement forces to crush domestic pro-Palestinian protests and many people around the world who live under oppression must only have reacted in shock at the brutality with which German and American police personnel have laid into the protesters in these so-called bastions of democracy and free speech.
The reasons for this softly-softly policy towards Israel may have less to do with historical factors such as the Hitler-perpetrated Holocaust and more to do with security concerns, the need for a dependable military ally in the face of Arab domination in the oil-rich Middle East and Gulf. (Many of these despotic Arab rulers are diehard US allies anyway).
An equally important, perhaps even more significant, factor is how, for example, politicians’ campaigns in the US and UK are funded by pro-Israeli big-money individuals and organisations that often tread a fine line when it comes to being “distanced” from the government of Israel to comply with foreign-funding restrictions; nonetheless they work zealously for the interests of the state of Israel.
Just google organisations such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee to learn the extent to which they fund the campaigns of pro-Israel politicians in the US. They are spending literally millions of dollars in primaries and congressional elections, besides the presidential race, to have a say in policy. Most recently it has taken out high-profile pro-Palestinian candidates in Democratic primaries for the Congress, with one or two exceptions.
The UK story is not dissimilar. Both mainstream Labour and Conservative parties’ candidates receive campaign contributions from Israel lobbyists. Little surprise that all “concern” that UK government leaders express about Gaza has not translated into an arms embargo.
While it’s right to look at the duplicity of the compromised Western leaders and politicians, it is also incumbent on commentators, analysts and even activists to examine the response of the Arab countries towards the genocidal Israeli campaign in Gaza.
From the oil-rich states with trillions of dollars invested/ deposited in Western economies and fuelling their growth and prosperity, to Middle-East countries with ostensibly formidable militaries, none have exerted pressure; they have largely indulged in lip service that Israel has not even considered worthy of a contemptuous reaction.
What was once an effective guerrilla force, the Palestine Liberation Organisation has now been eviscerated and is incapable of defending Palestinians under the umbrella of its Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, what more to talk of Gaza where its rival Hamas evicted it after a bloody fight a decade and a half ago.
However, just like the US and Germany, many Muslim countries, represented in the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, have very diligently and ruthlessly quelled any street protests against Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza. Who knows if it is lack of empathy or fear that anti-Israel protests could snowball into demonstrations against despotic rule at home.
Meanwhile protesters in the West have been defying their pro-Israel governments; countries such as Spain, Norway, Ireland and even tiny Slovenia have seen large demonstrations almost every weekend for the past 10 months – where governments and people have joined hands against the Gaza outrage. Among the ummah, the only defiant stand against Israel, even if limited, has been taken by what the allies in the grouping call the Axis of Resistance comprising Iran, Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Yemen’s Houthis. But years of sanctions have meant that those in the resistance have denuded capability and resources to offer “effective resistance”. This is where the Muslim world stands today.
While Gazans are being butchered with callous abandon, in a sad reflection on Israeli society, Netanyahu who was facing corruption allegations and possibly prison before Oct 7 last year, is now leading in the opinion polls. His Likud party’s fortunes have been revived by his murderous campaign. – Dawn/ANN