Visitors walking towards the main entrance of Goebbels’ former villa near Wandlitz, Germany. — ©2024 The New York Times Company
BEHIND thickets of beech trees, overgrown with nettles and beside a blue lake an hour north of Berlin, a villa that once belonged to a Nazi mastermind quietly rots.
No one knows what to do with the estate beside the Bogensee lake in Brandenburg. It was built for Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister, by his grateful country just before the start of World War II.
Owned by the state of Berlin today, it has sat mouldering expensively on the public’s tab, along with a set of dramatic dormitories built later by the Communist Party to house an indoctrination school. It is a nearly 8ha campus that echoes with the pasts of two totalitarian regimes.
Too burdensome for the state to continue carrying, prohibitively expensive for most real estate prospectors and tainted by history, Berlin has given up on selling or developing it.
Instead, it has offered to give the Nazi mansion away, free. (The taker, of course, would be subject to the government’s approval.)
In exasperated comments made to Parliament this spring, Stefan Evers, the state’s senator for finance, made the pitch – take it off our hands, or we will tear it down – setting off a flurry of interest in prospective takers from around the globe.
There were inquiries from a dermatologist who wanted to open a skin-care centre and from a few bargain hunters, Evers said recently in an interview in his offices in Berlin. None have been suitable, he said.
An earlier inquiry, from an extreme-right group called the Reichsburger movement, seemed to embody the authorities’ worst fears. The group denies the legitimacy of the current German state; some of its members are on trial for a plot to overthrow the government.
Such attention – that the estate’s association with the Nazi era might attract an unsavoury buyer – partly accounts for the villa’s neglect.
“The history of the place is precisely the reason why Berlin would never hand this building over to private hands where there would be a risk that it could be misused,” Evers said.
The fate of the villa is not only a logistical quandary for Germany. It illustrates a long-term and larger conundrum, the grounds of which have shifted over time, experts say: whether to preserve or obliterate the many edifices from Germany’s hateful past.
Directly after World War II, the prevailing approach was to move on, ignoring prior ownership, so as not to risk reifying it, according to Peter Longerich, a historian and the author of Goebbels, a biography. Hitler’s apartment in Munich, for example, has little information detailing its history; it has long been a police station in which officers still use Hitler’s own wooden bookshelves, he said.
Just outside the centre of Wandlitz, the wildwood has grown up around the house, blocking the door to the private cinema where Goebbels screened his propaganda films.
Cobwebs cloak bedroom windows. And motes of dust drift through airy salons where he wined and dined Nazi leadership, and where his six children played beside the hearth – until he and his wife poisoned them all in the war’s final days.
Maintenance of the property costs €280,000 a year just to keep it from falling into shambles, according to the buildings department.
Restoration would not only be expensive but introduce another thorny issue that dogs preservationists who must deal with former structures from both the Nazi and Communist chapters of Germany’s past.
“If they look too beautiful, you re-aestheticise their reign,” said Thomas Weber, a professor of history and international affairs at the University of Aberdeen, in Scotland. “But if you leave them but somehow destroy how they functioned at the time, then people will not understand, either.”
The mansion is filled with architectural flourishes that were popular among Nazi leaders, like its clever day-room windows that fold away into the floor – a touch also used in Hitler’s own vacation retreat in the Bavarian Alps. There is a bunker out back, too, just in case.
Other structures were added over time.
Down a path, past headless concrete statues of intertwined lovers, are several almost Federal-style buildings. They were used as a Communist international youth college from the 1940s until the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Up weed-sprouted steps and behind graffitied doors, their cavernous interiors hold barracks and an echoing auditorium.
It is a part of the site’s past often eclipsed by its Nazi heritage, said Gerwin Strobl, a modern history instructor at Cardiff University in Wales, who studies Germany. But it is one also painful to Germans.
“In fact, it covers two German dictatorships in succession. That also explains why it is also so difficult to find a use for it,” Strobl said. “But buildings by themselves aren’t evil.”
After hearing about Berlin’s offer to give away the property, Rabbi Menachem Margolin, chair of the European Jewish Association, sent an open letter offering to convert it into an education centre to counter all forms of hate.
“It is an important message to anyone,” Margolin said. “That even the darkest place in the world can become a source of light.”
Such a project is worthy, Evers said, but the issue is financing.
Walter Reich, former director of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, said it was Germany’s obligation to help pay.
“That’s part of the burden of German history,” Reich said in an email. “Germany’s unmasterable past.”
As the ash and alder creep over the villa, Oliver Borchert, the mayor of Wandlitz, has for years fended off interest from extreme right-wingers, including the coup-plotting Reichsburger group.
The place needs more than upkeep – it needs transformation, Borchert said: “You have to find a use that can stand against and reflect the shadows of the house and its history.” — ©2024 The New York Times Company
