The ICC warrant for Netanyahu’s arrest also implicates the US


Smoke rising after an Israeli airstrike hit a house in Gaza's Bureij refugee camp on Jan 12. — Reuters

THE United States House of Representatives voted in favour of a Bill to sanction the International Criminal Court (ICC) in retaliation for its arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the country’s former Defence minister Yoav Gallant last Thursday.

The ICC arrest warrants have been reverberating through Israel, but they also raise questions for the US.

If the international court believes that Israel may have committed war crimes in the Gaza Strip and engaged in a policy of deliberate starvation of civilians, then whose weapons were used? Which country protected Israel in the United Nations and blocked more robust efforts to channel food to starving Palestinians? The answer, of course, is the United States.

President Joe Biden last May denounced the ICC prosecutor’s request for warrants and said that “there is no equivalence – none – between Israel and Hamas”.

But there is a moral equivalence between an American child and an Israeli child and a Palestinian child. They all deserve to be protected. We should not operate as if there is a hierarchy in the value of children’s lives, with some invaluable and others expendable.

Aid workers I’ve interviewed overwhelmingly agree that Israel has used starvation as a tool of war. The impulse of Americans who are sceptical of the warrants will be to respond by noting the brutality of the Oct 7 atrocities by Hamas that preceded Israel’s assault on Gaza. Fair enough: The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for a Hamas leader for crimes against humanity.

The point is that war crimes by one side do not justify additional war crimes by the other. We should unite in condemning the savagery of attacks by Hamas, but that savagery does not excuse Israel’s use of US weapons to level entire neighbourhoods in Gaza.

Biden has spoken a good deal about the challenge Russia creates for the “rules-based international order”, and it’s because of Russian brutality in Ukraine that an arrest warrant was issued for Russian President Vladimir Putin. But if we decry Putin’s violations of international law in Ukraine, how can we simultaneously supply weapons that an international tribunal suggests are used for breaches of humanitarian law in Gaza?

Israel is now more isolated than ever, and it will be more difficult for Netanyahu to travel. Americans should also reflect on how we have become more isolated, as reflected in the UN resolutions calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Our allies supported it, but the US vetoed them.

When our weapons are implicated in war crimes, maybe it’s past time for a policy rethink. — ©2025 New York Times Company

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Focus

Toxic fallout from green gamble
Hidden gems in New Jersey
Romania’s fascist legacy resurfaces
Gold’s deadly grip
Thailand’s ‘dual prime minister’ model is a delicate tight-rope walk
Dutertes: The great ‘destabilisers’?
How to achieve peace in the Middle East
Playing with BRICS fire
Nesting nomads: How Malaysia can beat Bali and Bangkok
Cementing karst research

Others Also Read