Sodomy II: Anwar’s defence questions existence of lubricant


PUTRAJAYA: The defence in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's appeal has questioned whether there was penetration in the alleged sodomy case, as Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's testimony was inconsistent with regards to the existence of a commonly-used sexual lubricant.

Lawyer Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram, a former Federal Court judge, argued that according to the evidence from the complainant Mohd Saiful at the High Court, the act was vigorous and fast and he suffered pain in his anus and stomach. 

Subscribe now and receive FREE sooka plan for 1 month.
T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

Kelantan to update conditions for cinemas in the state
Tenggara Bersatu division chief, committee members exit party
Tragic end for woman during Deepavali picnic at Sungai Sedim
Ukraine sees Malaysia as Asean gateway for UAV partnerships
Eight missing after fishing trip found safe in Sarawak, says cop
Customs Department denies that DG Anis Rizana misused allocation for vacation
Malaysian Media Council needs to be established immediately
Eighteen-year-old dies after electrocution on express bus in Butterworth
Lowest starting salary on SPA website to be updated in December
Stricter laws to tackle cyberbullying be tabled at the coming Parliament sitting

Others Also Read