Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram. -filepic
KUALA LUMPUR: Many corrupt criminals may escape the law if the prosecution is required to prove each and every document in accordance with the strict requirements of the Evidence Act 1950, the High Court was told.
Lead prosecutor Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram (said this in his submission at the corruption trial of Datuk Seri Najib Razak involving RM2.28bil here on Monday (Dec 5).
He said the legislative purpose for introducing Section 41A of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act, by way of amendment, was reflective of Parliament's intention to displace Chapter V of the Evidence Act.
ALSO READ: 1MDB trial: Najib should have instructed CEO to be more cooperative with Treasury, says Irwan
"Bringing corrupt individuals to justice in accordance with the strict rules governing the prerequisites to admissibility under the Evidence Act may prove to be an insurmountable hurdle, especially in these days where transactions in the millions can be carried out electronically in the flash of an eye or where, as here, millions in cash are surreptitiously handed over.
"Requiring the prosecution to prove each and every document in accordance with the strict requirements of the Evidence Act could lead to the escape of many corrupt criminals," he said.
The introduction of Section 41A, Sri Ram said, was to avoid this consequence.
ALSO READ: Concerns over method used by MACC
Sri Ram was making his submission in an application by the prosecution to admit an audio recording of an alleged conversation between Najib and a Middle-Eastern leader in the trial to rebut Najib's defence that the monies that went into his personal bank accounts were donations.
The prosecution contended that the recording and transcript came within the ambit of Sections 6 through 9 of the Evidence Act 1950.
"They concern the accused’s role in 1MDB and his relationship with that company. It will also demonstrate the accused’s modus operandi at the material time," he added.
On the defence objection to the admission of the recording and the transcript on grounds that they were "improperly obtained", Sri Ram said cases decided by the Privy Council, the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Courts of Scotland were unanimous in saying that the general principle on the matter was that relevant evidence, however it was obtained, was admissible.
ALSO READ: 1MDB trial: Najib’s account considered ‘sensitive’, involved large sums, court told
The recording in question is part of a series of nine audio recordings disclosed by then Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief Latheefa Koya in January 2020, purportedly linked to SRC International and 1MDB, which also included another recording of an alleged phone conversation between Najib and his wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor, among others.
Najib, 69, is on trial for 25 charges in total: four for abuse of power that allegedly brought him financial benefit to the tune of RM2.28bil; and 21 for money laundering involving the same amount.
The submission continues before Justice Collin Lawrence Sequerah on Tuesday (Dec 6).
