PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has granted leave for a woman, six mothers and an NGO to proceed with their legal challenge on automatic citizenship for children born overseas to Malaysian mothers with foreign spouses.
A three-judge panel, chaired by Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Justice Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, granted the leave application here on Wednesday (Dec 14) after the respondents, represented by Senior Federal Counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly and Liew Horng Bin, did not object to it.
ALSO READ: Women’s groups look to Nancy Shukri to spearhead law reforms
Other judges on the bench were Justices Vernon Ong Lam Kiat and Mary Lim Thiam Suan.
In Wednesday's proceedings, the panel heard two separate applications for leave to appeal on the same matter together.
The first application was filed by six Malaysian mothers and NGO Family Frontiers for leave to appeal against the Malaysian government, Home Minister and the National Registration Department (NRD) director-general.
The second leave application was by 25-year-old Mahisha Sulaiha Abdul Majeed, who has a Malaysian mother and Indian national father and wants a court declaration to be a citizen.
The court also ordered two questions of law proposed by the six mothers and Family Frontiers to be subsumed into the set of questions by Mahisha Sulaiha.
The revised legal questions, to be raised during the appeal hearing, are:
1. Whether a person who was born outside the federation to a Malaysian mother is a citizen of Malaysia by operation of law pursuant to Article 14(1)(b), read with Part II Section 1(b) of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution;
2. Whether the term "father" in Part II Section 1(b) of the Second Schedule to the Federal Constitution under Article 14 on citizenship should cease to be read literally in a discriminatory way, after the coming into force of the amendment to Article 8(2) of the Federal Constitution in September 2001 which prohibits gender discrimination; and
3. Whether Article 8(2) of the Federal Constitution should be interpreted to prohibit gender discrimination in matters concerning citizenship, given that Article 8(5) was not also amended to exclude "citizenship" as a subject not falling under Article 8 at the time when Article 8(2) of the Federal Constitution was amended to generally prohibit gender discrimination.
ALSO READ: Azalina files motion seeking to amend citizenship law for children born overseas
The hearing date for the appeal has yet to be fixed.
On Sept 9 last year, Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Justice Akhtar Tahir ruled that children born overseas to Malaysian mothers married to foreigners are entitled by operation of law to be citizens of Malaysia.
In his decision, Justice Akhtar held that the word "father" in Section 1 (b) must be read to include the mother.
However, on Aug 5, a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal in a 2-1 majority decision overturned the decision, ruling that children born overseas to Malaysian women who are married to foreign spouses are not entitled by operation of law to be citizens.
ALSO READ: Azalina vows to address, amend outdated laws to be relevant with current times
In the originating summons, filed on Dec 18, 2020, the plaintiffs sought for their overseas-born children to have the right to become Malaysian citizens and six specific court orders, including a declaration that Section 1(b) and Section 1(c) of the Second Schedule, Part II of the Federal Constitution be read harmoniously with Article 8 (2) to include Malaysian mothers as a condition for children born abroad to be given automatic citizenship.
Among other things, they also sought a court order for all relevant government agencies, including the NRD, Immigration Department and Malaysian Embassies, to issue all documents relating to citizenship (including passports and identity cards) to children born abroad to Malaysian mothers with foreign spouses.
They named the Malaysian government, the Home Minister and the NRD director-general as defendants.
