Court says no to Rosmah


PUTRAJAYA: There is no merit for Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor to question the appointment of the late Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram as the lead prosecutor in her solar hybrid project trial, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

A three-judge panel chaired by Justice Hanipah Farikullah unanimously dismissed Rosmah’s appeal against the High Court’s dismissal of her leave application to initiate judicial review on grounds that there was no merit in the appeal.

Other judges on the panel were Justices Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali and See Mee Chun.

In the decision, which was read out by Justice See, the panel agreed that Rosmah’s application for leave to initiate the judicial review at the High Court was “out of time”.

This is since the application should have been filed within three months from the date the fiat (authorisation letter) was first sighted.

Justice See said the appellant should have filed the application within the time frame where the appellant would have been aware that the fiat was, in their own words, invalid, thus rendering the appointment of Sri Ram illegal, irregular and defective, and the proceedings of the solar hybrid case a nullity, void and a mistrial.

“The judicial review, being mandated within three months from the date (of first sighting), we find the appellant to be out of time,” she said here yesterday.

The court ordered Rosmah to pay RM10,000 in costs.

No judicial review: The court has ordered Rosmah to pay RM10,000 in costs.No judicial review: The court has ordered Rosmah to pay RM10,000 in costs.

On June 24, 2022, Rosmah filed the leave application to initiate a judicial review at the High Court.

She named the Attorney General, the government of Malaysia and Sri Ram as respondents.

Rosmah sought a declaration that the appointment of Sri Ram as senior deputy public prosecutor through three letters of appointment (fiat), dated July 8, 2020, May 11 and May 21, 2021, was unlawful.

In addition, she sought a declaration that the entire prosecution proceedings and full trial for the solar case which took place from Nov 15, 2018 until the defence closed the case were invalid and void.

She sought to be acquitted of all charges under Section 16 (a) (A) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009.

On Aug 30, 2022, the High Court dismissed her application on grounds that the application for leave for judicial review made under Order 53 rule 3(6) of the Rules of Court 2012 challenging Sri Ram’s fiat must be filed within three months from the date when the grounds of application first arose or when the decision was first communicated to the applicant (Rosmah).

On Sept 1, 2022, Justice Mohamed Zaini Mazlan (now a Court of Appeal judge) found Rosmah guilty of the corruption charges in the solar hybrid project case and sentenced her to 10 years in jail and a RM970mil fine.

She has filed an appeal against her conviction and sentence and is currently out on a RM2mil bail pending her appeal at the Court of Appeal.

Meanwhile, Sri Ram, who was a former Federal Court judge, passed away at the age of 79 in January.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

Anwar holds bilateral meeting with Li Qiang, thanks China for BRICS support
Four charged over casino fight
Kelantan proposes constructing wall along Malaysia-Thailand border
Body of missing drowned teenager found near Teluk Sengat
MACC to continue recording statements from FashionValet founders on Nov 6
Bernama, China Media Group exchange MOU to strengthen media cooperation
Anwar, Li witness exchange of documents on BRI cooperation plan
Elderly vegetable trader loses RM274,000 to scam syndicate
Typhoon Kristine mission: 16 Malaysian Air Force officers, personnel return home safely
Perlis Mufti sues Facebook account holder for alleged GISB related defamatory statements

Others Also Read