PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has postponed to Aug 1 the hearing of Barisan Nasional candidate Tan Sri M Ramasamy's appeal to challenge the 15th General Election (GE15) results for the Segamat parliamentary seat.
This was because his lead counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah was unwell on Friday (July 28).
A three-member bench led by Justice Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof postponed the hearing, which had been earlier fixed for Friday, following a request by co-counsel Sarah Maalini Abishegam.
ALSO READ: July 28 set for hearing of MIC man's Segamat election petition appeal
She informed the court that Muhammad Shafee was on medical leave for severe migraine and vertigo.
Justice Zabariah, who sat with Justices Datuk Seri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim and Datuk Mary Lim Thiam Suan, said the appeal will proceed on Tuesday (Aug 1) and it would be a physical sitting.
Earlier at Friday’s online proceeding, Sarah told the court that Muhammad Shafee had been advised to restrict his movement to prevent him from falling.
Senior Federal Counsel Suzana Atan appeared for the returning officer and the Election Commission (EC), while lawyer Lau Yi Leong, who represented Segamat MP R Yuneswaran, did not object to the postponement.
In GE15 on Nov 19, Pakatan Harapan candidate Yuneswaran won the seat with a majority of 5,669 votes and was declared the elected MP for that constituency, defeating Ramasamy, Perikatan Nasional’s P Poobalan and Pejuang’s Syed Hairoul Faizey.
Ramasamy, who is MIC treasurer, subsequently filed a petition seeking, among others, a declaration that the parliamentary election for the constituency was void and a declaration that Yuneswaran was not duly elected as MP.
He named Yuneswaran, the returning officer and the EC as respondents.
On April 3, Election Court judge Mohd Radzi Abdul Hamid dismissed Ramasamy’s election petition after accepting the preliminary objections raised by the respondents.
Among the objections were that Ramasamy failed to comply with Rule 15(4) of the Election Petition Rules 1954 pertaining to the particulars of his (Ramasamy's) affidavit of service, and on his failure to comply with the Election Petition Rules regarding the facts pleaded in his petition, which were incapable of sustaining the declarations sought. – Bernama
