PM Anwar overstepped for refusing Parliament to debate Zahid's DNAA, says Takiyuddin


PETALING JAYA: Perikatan Nasional has accused Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim of power abuse and breaking the law for refusing Parliament to debate the High Court's decision on Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's Yayasan Akalbudi corruption case.

Perikatan Nasional chief whip Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan (pic) said that the Prime Minister does not have any authority or right to determine or decide based on the standing order if there is a motion submitted to debate the matter.

ALSO READ: Ahmad Zahid's DNAA cannot be debated in Parliament, says Anwar

He said the acceptance or rejection of such a motion is within the jurisdiction and discretion of the Speaker of the House.

"It is clear that the Prime Minister has made a statement that exceeds his authority and role as the Head of the Council by preempting the decision that should have been made by the Speaker of the House," said Takiyuddin in a statement on Saturday (Sept 9).

Takiyuddin added that the need for the case, in which Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid was granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA), to be debated in the highest forum in the country was also increasingly necessary and urgent considering its great impact not only on the legal and judicial institutions, but also to the image and integrity of the government and the country in the eyes of the people and the international community.

"The negative response, dissatisfaction and at least surprise among many parties, in addition to the debate and widespread comments among the people also clearly show that the case and the decision of the Attorney General are indications that the case is of importance.

ALSO READ: Anwar: I did not interfere

"Perikatan also sees the Prime Minister's excuse that the Attorney General is not a minister or a Member of Parliament to support his statement for rejecting the debate on this issue in Parliament as unacceptable.

"So far, all legal issues, including those raised in Parliament by the Prime Minister himself and his party when he was in the Opposition, have been answered and even given clear explanations by the relevant ministers, including court cases involving 1MDB issues and the like," said Takiyuddin.

He said Perikatan strongly believed that the decisions that led to the DNAA judgment need to be scrutinised and examined by the Parliament because it was closely related to the issue of integrity and trustworthiness of various parties.

ALSO READ: High Court grants Zahid discharge not amounting to acquittal in YAB case

On Friday, Anwar had said the High Court's decision to grant Ahmad Zahid a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) cannot be debated in a special Parliament sitting.

He said Parliament cannot be transformed into a courtroom to discuss the decision made by Judge Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah regarding Ahmad Zahid, who is also Deputy Prime Minister.

Anwar said the government has no objection to any Member of Parliament asking about the case during the normal Dewan Rakyat sessions as long as Parliament is not turned into a courtroom.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

Kelantan proposes constructing wall along Malaysia-Thailand border
Body of missing drowned teenager found near Teluk Sengat
MACC to continue recording statements from FashionValet founders on Nov 6
Bernama, China Media Group exchange MOU to strengthen media cooperation
Anwar, Li witness exchange of documents on BRI cooperation plan
Elderly vegetable trader loses RM274,000 to scam syndicate
Typhoon Kristine mission: 16 Malaysian Air Force officers, personnel return home safely
Perlis Mufti sues Facebook account holder for alleged GISB related defamatory statements
Plans to amend Registration of Criminals and Undesirable Persons Act underway, says Saifuddin
Appeals Court dismisses man’s appeal to claim RM29,000 in unpaid salary from company

Others Also Read