Ruckus erupts over issue of Zahid’s DNAA outcome


KUALA LUMPUR: The six-day special sitting for the 12th Malaysia Plan Mid-Term Review got off to a fiery start when a war of words erupted over the outcome of Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamid’s graft case.

It all began when Wan Ahmad Fayshal Wan Ahmad Kamal (PN-Machang) stood up to ask a question on the issue.

But before he could do so, Speaker Tan Sri Johari Abdul explained that MPs would be given a chance to raise matters unrelated to the House’s order of business after the agenda of the special sitting concludes.

This led to a loud exchange between Perikatan Nasional MPs and government backbenchers.

At one point, the argument was centred on whether the Prime Minister had superseded the Speaker’s authority when Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim commented last week that there was no need for the Dewan to debate the High Court’s decision on the Deputy Prime Minister’s corruption case.

This was raised by Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan (PN-Kota Baru) and Datuk Seri Ronald Kiandee (PN-Beluran).

However, Johari said Anwar’s remarks were made outside of the Dewan.

“That is his right,” he said.

“He did not make a decision on my behalf. My decision today (yesterday) is that I will give the Yang Berhormat from Machang the opportunity to raise the matter later,” Johari said.

Wan Ahmad Fayshal had filed an emergency motion last week to debate the issue of Ahmad Zahid being granted a discharge not amounting to acquittal over 47 graft charges.

When pressed by Takiyuddin on Wan Ahmad Fayshal’s emergency motion, Johari said it was rejected.

Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainuddin (PN-Larut) subsequently asked for further clarification on why the motion was rejected. Calling on the MPs to be patient, Johari said an opportunity to debate the matter would be given later.

“I know that the engine is still hot on the first day,” Johari said in jest while proceeding with the Dewan’s order of business.

However, another brief shouting match erupted moments later over the dress code of MPs when Hamzah asked whether a necktie and blazer were optional.

“I heard the Speaker saying that if we don’t wear a tie, then we don’t need to wear a coat. So when we wear a tie, we don’t need to wear a coat?” he asked.

Mond Sany Hamzan (PH-Hulu Langat) retorted that the Opposition Leader was wasting time and confusing others.

At a press conference later, Perikatan Nasional MPs claimed they were denied the opportunity to raise the issue regarding Ahmad Zahid despite the Speaker’s earlier assurance.

“After the Prime Minister tabled the Mid-Term Review of the 12th Malaysia Plan, the Speaker adjourned the sitting,” Arau MP Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim said.

This left a question mark on the status of the issue, he added.

Wan Ahmad Fayshal said the Opposition bench wanted to know whether there would be a chance for them to raise the matter today.

“What is there to be afraid of or hide when debating this issue?” he asked.

Ahmad Zahid was granted the DNAA on Sept 4.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

ruckus , parliament

   

Next In Nation

What's at stake for Malaysians as the US elects its next president?
Out of gas, out of time
Langkawi aims for three million tourists via Poland flights
Charging points in buses not subjected to safety inspection
Ready to transition away from NGVs
Close encounters with the overheating and melting kind
‘Tax exempt not-for-profit hospitals’
Move to seek Israel’s expulsion
MAS expands WiFi in the sky to B737-8 fleet
Once a darling, NGV solution hits the wall

Others Also Read