MyWatch ex-chairman granted leave to appeal unlawful detention


PUTRAJAYA: Former Malaysian Crime Watch Task Force (MyWatch) chairman R. Sri Sanjeevan (pic) can appeal to the Federal Court against the dismissal of a ruling in declaring his 16-day detention under the Prevention of Crime Act 1959 (Poca) as unlawful.

The Federal Court three-member bench led by Justice Datuk Mary Lim Thiam Suan together with Datuk Abdul Karim Abdul Jalil in a 2-1 majority decision granted leave to Sanjeevan as the applicant to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision, however, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang dissented.

The constitutional question allowed to be argued in the substantive appeal is where an order issuing the writ of habeas corpus is made in relation to the remand of a person, is it a necessary implication of such order that the detention was not effected in accordance with law under Article 5 (2) of the Federal Constitution, and was thus unlawful for contravening Article 5 (1) Article 5 (2) of the Federal Constitution and amounting to false imprisonment.

Sanjevaan, 39, sued the investigating officer ASP Poonnam E Keling, the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and the Federal Government, claiming he was wrongly detained by Poonnam for 16 days from July 10 to 26, 2016, alleging that he was also assaulted and had sought damages for losses and injuries suffered.

On June 28, 2022, High Court judge Datuk Ahmad Bache allowed Sanjeevan’s civil suit for false imprisonment and ordered general, exemplary and aggravated damages to be paid to him.

The judge also granted a declaration that Sanjeevan’s detention was unlawful and a declaration that his rights under Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution had been breached by Poonnam and found the latter to be liable for unlawfully detaining Sanjeevan.

The police and the government filed an appeal to the Court of Appeal against the High Court’s decision and on Sept 15 last year, the Court of Appeal allowed for an overturn of the High Court's decision.

Sanjeevan was arrested under Poca for his alleged involvement in criminal activities on July 10, 2016, and was produced before a magistrate the following day who issued a 21-day remand order on Sanjeevan.

Before the expiry of the 21-day remand period, Sanjeevan filed a habeas corpus application to secure his release from detention.

The High Court then allowed his application on July 26, 2016, due to breaching a mandatory procedure under Poca.

The government filed an appeal to the Federal Court but subsequently withdrew the appeal. Sanjeevan then filed a civil action against the police and government for false imprisonment.

Sanjeevan was represented by lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar while Senior Federal Counsel Andi Razalijaya A Dadi acted for the government. - Bernama

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

Cheaper to get prescribed meds from private clinics and pharmacies, says MPS
Rooted in reminiscence: M’sian game designers go big on the nostalgia factor
Bernama chairman Wong bags Media Personality of the Year award at Seba Awards
Student turns X into X-rated platform
Witness paid RM19mil to end probe
Furry friends in urgent need of home
Director nabbed in RM1.1mil fraud probe
Healthcare costs rise beyond just medication
Penampang council under pressure to lower parking fees
A cleaner and greener future

Others Also Read