Judge questions Najib's counsel on distinction between personal and political spending


KUALA LUMPUR: The trial judge in Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) case on Tuesday (Oct) questioned the defence team about the distinction between the former premier’s personal expenses and those for political purposes.

During his submission at the close of the prosecution's case at the High Court, Judge Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah posed the question to Najib’s lead counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah.

Judge Sequerah: (Is there) any difference between spending for political and personal usage?

Muhammad Shafee: We have proved that 99% of the money in his account was not used for his personal purposes. For instance, he didn’t buy a private plane or treat everybody with champagne in a New York bar, or something like that.

"My Lord, I have to use this word; it is against the pathology of corruption that a person took this money and spent it not for personal use but for the benefit of the public,” he contended, adding that Najib had used RM300mil from 1MDB for the 2013 general election.

At this point, Judge Sequerah questioned the veteran counsel about the existence of any case law backing his argument.

In response, Muhammad Shafee said that "it is an inference of facts" and that no case is quite like Najib's 1MDB case, setting it apart from any precedent.

The judge then asked for the prosecution’s comment on the matter. Deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Kamal Bahrin Omar replied that they were only concerned with the fact that the alleged funds, which entered Najib's accounts - came from illegal proceeds.

Fellow DPP Ahmad Akram Gharib added that it did not matter whether Najib used the purported funds for personal or political reasons.

"The law says that it is for his advantage," he said.

Najib, 71, faces four charges of abusing his position to obtain RM2.3bil from 1MDB funds at the AmIslamic Bank Berhad branch on Jalan Raja Chulan, Bukit Ceylon, between Feb 24, 2011, and Dec 19, 2014.

He also faces 21 charges of money laundering involving the same amount at the same bank between March 22, 2013 and Aug 30, 2013.

Najib is charged under Section 23(1) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 and Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act.

The submission continues. – Bernama

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

Report on Likas fire that claimed five young lives ready in two weeks
Primary school canteen operator to face charges over food poisoning incident
Control of Smoking Products Act to be enforced prudently, says Dzulkefly
Tobacco, vape industry players urged to prepare for Act 852 which comes into effect today
Gerakan lacks a voter base to criticise its Perikatan partners, says Bersatu leader
Rafida Zaiddin's humble beginnings capture hearts as she embarks on university journey
Motorcycle licence upgrade set at RM160, says JPJ
Lahad Datu incursion: Review of death sentence for seven Filipinos begins Oct 2
Mahkota polls: Chinese voter turnout close to 50%, not 35%, says Liew
4WD vehicle bringing Khadijah Ibrahim spun, overturned in accident, say cops

Others Also Read