FILE PHOTO: South Africa's president elect Cyril Ramaphosa speaks on the day of his inauguration ceremony for his second term as South African president, in Pretoria, South Africa, June 19, 2024. REUTERS/Alet Pretorius/File Photo
(Reuters) - South Africa's new unity government inspired cautious optimism on Monday from industry and financial markets but many citizens and political analysts fear the coalition will struggle to deliver economic growth and social change.
President Cyril Ramaphosa appointed former main opposition leader John Steenhuisen to head an important ministry on Sunday, bringing the Democratic Alliance and other parties into a coalition cabinet for the first time in three decades.
The ruling African National Congress was forced to join rival parties to stay in power after losing its majority in a May 29 poll, getting just 40% of the vote, the first time it has received under half of votes in a national election.
The compromise struck left the DA with six ministries, including agriculture, a major part of South Africa's economy, which went to Steenhuisen, public works, environment and basic education. It also got six deputy minister posts, including finance, trade and energy.
"The sheer weight and spread of these twelve portfolios amount to a recognition that the DA has a meaningful and vital role to play in the reconstruction of our country," Steenhuisen said in a speech.
PARTY INTERESTS
For some, especially business owners, bringing a centre-right, overtly capitalist party into the fold was a welcome step forward.
"Business is looking forward to working with the new administration," Busisiwe Mavuso, CEO of Business Leadership South Africa, said in a newsletter. "They will find a willing partner in business, which will enthusiastically back reform."
Yet she also warned "they cannot afford to squander the optimism," pointing out that turning around an economy that has been in the doldrums for 10 years was a mammoth task.
Jee-A van der Linde at Oxford Economics called Ramaphosa's cabinet a "business-friendly outcome" but said it remained to be seen whether it could solve South Africa's economic woes.
For parties representing the interests of workers, the mood was even more guarded.
"Merit does not appear to have been the overarching motivation for all the (cabinet) appointments," Federation of Unions of South Africa (FEDUSA) said in a statement, adding they "seem to favour political party interests (rather) ... than addressing the urgent requirements of the South African nation."
Some businesses seemed to share this fear, with the South African Chamber of Commerce and Industry warning key goals "will not be achievable if there is no meritocracy", while political analyst Daniel Silke decried a lack of "outside experts in key portfolios not beholden to ... political interests".
Others were also critical of the size of the cabinet, increased to cater for all the coalition parties.
"South Africa had a comparatively large cabinet already, and even the DA has previously called for significant reductions," Markus Korhonen, senior associate in Strategic Intelligence at S-RM, said.
"The expansion of deputy minister posts to no fewer than 43 will do little to quell this criticism," he added.
(Additional reporting by Wendell Roelf in Cape Town and Kopano Gumbi in Johannesburg; Editing by Emelia Sithole-Matarise)
