Justice not served in sexual harassment case


I READ with utter dismay the report “‘DPP decided against sexual harassment prosecution’” (The Star, Aug 31; online at https://bit.ly/34PJOKH), which quoted Brickfields OCPD Asst Comm Zailrulnizam Mohd Zainuddin@Hilmi saying the DPP (deputy public prosecutor) made the decision after considering that the public university where the offence took place had taken action against the suspect.

This reasoning is astounding considering the fact that the suspect was investigated under Section 354 of the Penal Code for outrage of modesty.

Get 30% off with our ads free Premium Plan!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM9.73 only

Billed as RM9.73 for the 1st month then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month
RM8.63/month

Billed as RM103.60 for the 1st year then RM148 thereafters.

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Letters

Mind-numbing effects of excessive social media use
Can private hospitals in Malaysia be efficient, compassionate and profitable all at the same time?
Milestone in bilateral relations but challenges lie ahead
Opportunities for the disabled in JS-SEZ
Speed up adoption of biotechnology
Keeping mum is the best option
Drug testing proposal raises numerous concerns
Solve traffic bottleneck at JB checkpoint
Factors to be noted for next education blueprint
Strategies to ensure sustainability of PTPTN

Others Also Read