Beyond the sweetness


WE refer to the thought-provoking article “WHO cancer arm deems aspartame ‘possible carcinogen’; consumption limits unchanged” (The Star, July 14; online at bit.ly/aspartamewho), which emphasised our shared concern over the health implications of the use of non-nutritive sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose in Malaysia.

This development brings into question the public’s acceptance of the Malaysian sugar tax intended to encourage the consumption of lower sucrose beverages. Ironically, the tax inadvertently motivates food manufacturers to use non-nutritive sweeteners as a compensatory measure for the sweetness deficit resulting from reduced sucrose.

Get 30% off with our ads free Premium Plan!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM9.73 only

Billed as RM9.73 for the 1st month then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month
RM8.63/month

Billed as RM103.60 for the 1st year then RM148 thereafters.

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Food; sugar alternatives

   

Next In Letters

Fragmented attention is reshaping a generation
Former drug addicts need more support
Let’s welcome 2025 with enthusiasm
Better urban planning needed
Shorten cooling-off period
KLIA needs improvement
End public caning and corporal punishment
Alarming state of healthcare system
How AI and social media are quietly transforming lives
Road accidents for the weary: Time for actual reforms in the name of safety

Others Also Read