Opinion: Meta and Twitter show the drawbacks of giving self-satisfied billionaires too much power


As has been the case for the last year, the problem seems to be Zuckerberg’s inability to articulate where he’s leading his company as it undergoes transitions on multiple fronts. — AFP

Back in the prehistoric era – in 2012, when Facebook staged one of the most hyped initial public stock offerings of all time – I warned the company’s newly minted shareholders that they had become wedded to Mark Zuckerberg.

Then 28, the company founder became one of the most deeply entrenched chief executives in American business. Facebook’s two-class stock structure allowed Zuckerberg to control 57% of all shareholder votes despite owning only about 28% of all its shares.

Get 30% off with our ads free Premium Plan!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM9.73 only

Billed as RM9.73 for the 1st month then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month
RM8.63/month

Billed as RM103.60 for the 1st year then RM148 thereafters.

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Tech News

As TikTok runs out of options in the US, this billionaire has a plan to save it
Google offers to loosen search deals in US antitrust case remedy
Is Bluesky the new Twitter for teachers in the US?
'Metaphor: ReFantazio', 'Dragon Age', 'Astro Bot' and an indie wave lead the top video games of 2024
Opinion: You can pay for white noise, but you don’t need to
Rumble to receive $775 million strategic investment from Tether
OpenAI unveils 'o3' reasoning AI models in test phase
Qualcomm secures key win in chips trial against Arm
US finalizes up to $6.75 billion in chips awards for Samsung, Texas Instruments, Amkor
Potential TikTok bidder seeks a CEO, prepares business overhaul

Others Also Read