Google says curbing liability shield would make Web less safe


Google argued that the justices could break ‘a central building block of the modern Internet’ if they choose to narrow Section 230, which protects online companies from being sued over posts from their users. — AFP

Alphabet Inc’s Google told the US Supreme Court in a filing Jan 12 that undercutting social media’s legal protections could make the Internet less safe and useful for its billions of users.

The company defended social media’s prized legal shield, known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which will be the subject of a case before the court next month.

Google argued that the justices could break "a central building block of the modern Internet” if they choose to narrow Section 230, which protects online companies from being sued over posts from their users.

"The Internet would devolve into a disorganized mess and a litigation minefield,” Google’s lawyers wrote in the filing.

The case was brought by the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, a 23-year-old US citizen who was killed by ISIS in Paris in November 2015. Her family asserts that YouTube, which Google owns, violated the Anti-Terrorism Act when its algorithms recommended ISIS-related content to users. The family claims that even if the company isn’t liable for the ISIS content, the algorithmic recommendations shouldn’t be protected by Section 230.

The case could have huge implications for the future of online speech and whether some of the world’s most powerful companies should be held accountable for the content they promote. It could affect social media companies like Meta Platforms Inc and Twitter Inc, as well as smaller tech companies such as Etsy Inc and Pinterest Inc.

Google’s filing focused on the importance of algorithms to the modern Internet. Most websites are functional and easy to use because of sorting algorithms, so removing the protection for online recommendations would likely have far-reaching effects, Google argued.

Lower courts have found that Section 230 protects Internet companies from lawsuits when they decide how to display content. But policy makers on both sides of the aisle have argued for years that it’s time to refresh Section 230, which was written when the internet was still new.

The Justice Department last year partially sided with the Gonzalez family in the case, arguing that Section 230 doesn’t necessarily protect social media companies from liability when they promote illegal content. – Bloomberg

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

   

Next In Tech News

The Internet is rife with fake reviews. Will AI make it worse?
Secretive game developer codes hit 'Balatro' in Canadian prairie province
We asked OpenAI’s Santa chatbot for logistics tips. It stressed celebrating small wins
Exclusive-Microsoft works to add non-OpenAI models into 365 Copilot products, sources say
Google's proposed search result changes get thumbs up from EU airlines
Polish e-commerce Allegro's unit sues Alphabet for $568 million
Elon Musk's X lifts price for premium-plus tier to pay creators
US crypto industry eyes possible day-one Trump executive orders
Britannica didn’t just survive. It’s an AI company now
'Who's next?': Misinformation and online threats after US CEO slaying

Others Also Read