Microsoft's LinkedIn settles advertisers' lawsuit over alleged overcharges


FILE PHOTO: A keyboard is placed in front of a displayed LinkedIn logo in this illustration taken February 21, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

(Reuters) -LinkedIn agreed to pay $6.625 million to settle a proposed class action accusing the Microsoft unit of overcharging advertisers by inflating how many people watched video ads on its platform.

A preliminary settlement was filed late on Thursday in San Jose, California federal court, and requires approval by U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in San Jose, California.

LinkedIn denied wrongdoing. It also agreed to use reasonable efforts for two years to hire an outside auditor to review its ad metrics.

Advertisers led by TopDevz of Sacramento, California and Noirefy of Chicago accused LinkedIn of inflating ad metrics by counting video ad "views" from users' LinkedIn apps, even when videos played only off-screen because users scrolled past them.

The lawsuit began two weeks after LinkedIn disclosed in November 2020 that its engineers fixed software bugs on the business-focused social media platform that may have led to more than 418,000 overcharges, most under $25.

LinkedIn provided credits to nearly all affected advertisers.

Thursday's settlement covers U.S. advertisers who bought ads on LinkedIn between January 2015 and May 2023.

In a statement, LinkedIn said the settlement "underscores our commitment to the integrity of our ads products and providing a trusted platform for our members and customers."

LinkedIn is based in Sunnyvale, California, and Microsoft is based in Redmond, Washington. Microsoft's profit totaled $66.1 billion in the nine months ending March 31.

Judge van Keulen had dismissed the lawsuit in December 2021. Advertisers appealed, but put the appeal on hold so both sides could mediate the dispute.

The advertisers' lawyers may seek up to $1,656,250, or 25% of the settlement amount, for legal fees.

The case is In re LinkedIn Advertising Metrics Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 20-08324.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Kirsten Donovan)

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

   

Next In Tech News

Musk's xAI in talks for share in future Tesla revenue, WSJ reports
Review: Ignore the negativity, ‘Star Wars Outlaws’ is fun and refreshing non-Jedi adventure
Social media platform X back up after brief outage, Downdetector shows
MCMC to quarantine rather than block websites with minimal prohibited�content
New iPhone will use Arm’s chip technology for AI, FT reports
‘Astro Bot’ review: All history lessons should be this fun
Byju's auditor BDO resigns after start of bankruptcy proceedings, company says
Barbershop murder video in the US called too gruesome, yet still up
More kids in the US have an eye condition these days. Why you shouldn’t be too quick to blame phones
An app called Why?! aims to foster closeness because folks are lonely

Others Also Read