Google defeats lawsuit over gift card fraud


FILE PHOTO: The logo for Google is seen at a Google store in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., November 17, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

(Reuters) - A federal judge dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit accusing Google of illegally profiting from Google Play gift card scams by refusing to refund millions of dollars stolen from victims.

In a late Monday decision, U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman said the plaintiff Judy May lost money because scammers induced her to buy gift cards, and failed to show that Google caused her losses or knew it was receiving stolen funds.

The San Jose, California-based judge also said Google was not liable for keeping 15% to 30% commissions on purchases that scammers made with the gift cards, because Google's conduct was unrelated to the original fraud.

May said she lost $1,000 in April 2021 when a scammer posing as a relative instructed her to contact a supposed government agent, who told her she was eligible for federal grant money if she bought Google Play gift cards.

The Brownsville, Indiana resident said she provided the codes on the back to cover supposed upfront costs, but the scammers used the codes to make purchases.

May said she would not have bought the cards had Google warned on the packaging about scams, and that anyone demanding payment with the cards was a scammer.

Lawyers for May did not immediately respond on Tuesday to requests for comment. Google, a unit of Alphabet, did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Freeman said May could try to refile her lawsuit, but dismissed a claim seeking triple damages for good. Alphabet is based in Mountain View, California.

In 2023, Americans lost $217 million in gift card or reload card fraud, according to the Federal Trade Commission.

The actual amount is likely much higher because the data cover only reported cases. Citing FTC data from 2021, May said Google Play cards account for about 20% of gift card scams.

The case is May v Google LLC et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-01314.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Tomasz Janowski)

   

Next In Tech News

Rio Tinto-backed lithium tech startup set to raise second round of funds
Maybank: DuitNow Transfer and DuitNow QR services temporarily unavailable (Nov 25)
Atos receives offer from French government for its advanced computing activities
Diehard gamers are fuelling demand for esports hotels in China
When AI’s output is a threat to AI itself
Beware of crypto scams on Bluesky, already a victim of its own success
What forcing Google to sell Chrome could mean
To maintain growth, AI firms seek accords with publishing giants
Australia PM plays down privacy fears of social media ban for children
Trump pick Lutnick's firm in talks with Tether for $2 billion bitcoin lending project, Bloomberg reports

Others Also Read