YouTubers are selling their unused video footage to AI companies


By selling that content to AI companies, creators have a way to diversify their income beyond advertising deals with brands. — AFP

YouTubers and other digital content creators are selling their unused video footage to artificial intelligence companies seeking exclusive videos to better train their AI algorithms, oftentimes netting thousands of dollars per deal.

OpenAI, Alphabet Inc’s Google, AI media company Moonvalley and several other AI companies are collectively paying hundreds of content creators for access to their unpublished videos, according to people familiar with the negotiations. That content, which hasn’t been posted elsewhere online, is considered valuable for training artificial intelligence systems since it’s unique.

AI companies are currently paying between US$1 (RM4.50) and US$4 (RM18) per minute of footage, the people said, with prices increasing depending on video quality or format. Videos that are shot in 4K, for example, go for a higher price, as does non-traditional footage like videos captured from drones or using 3D animations. Most footage, such as unused video created for networks like YouTube, Instagram and TikTok, is selling for somewhere between US$1 (RM4.50) and US$2 (RM9) per minute.

OpenAI, Meta Platforms Inc and Adobe Inc all launched AI video generators last year, which can create realistic-looking videos from text prompts. To do that, though, AI companies need massive amounts of data for training, sometimes millions of hours of video content.

“It’s an arms race and they all need more footage,” said Dan Levitt, senior vice president of creators at Wasserman, which represents social media stars such as YouTuber MatPat and fashion influencer Taylen Biggs. “I see a window in the next couple years where licensing footage is lucrative for creators who are open to doing so. But I don’t think that window is going to last that long.”

Some content creators shoot hundreds of hours of video footage each year in the process of making videos for YouTube, Instagram or TikTok. But much of that content never actually makes it online, meaning creators don’t make money from it. By selling that content to AI companies, creators have a way to diversify their income beyond advertising deals with brands.

“At Moonvalley, the vast majority of our training data is coming sourced directly from content creators & filmmakers who are interested in licensing any video content that they own,” the company wrote in a statement shared with Bloomberg. A spokespeople for Google and OpenAI declined to comment.

Artificial intelligence companies have faced intense criticism for using text, videos and photos posted to the internet without compensating the people who created that content. Last year, news publishers, actors and individual content creators filed lawsuits against OpenAI, Meta, Nvidia Corp, and others for using their intellectual property to build AI models and allegedly violating copyright protections.

“Anything that you publicly post essentially is up for grabs, and we’ve seen companies just rip it and ingest it into their system,” said Levitt, who has encouraged creators to sign licensing deals. “This is a way to actually participate in that, to do this in a much more legal, structured manner, and now you at least have some upside.”

Talent agencies that represent digital creators have been working with third-party licensing companies like Troveo AI and Calliope Networks to manage the rights for the thousands of hours of video footage owned by creators. Those companies negotiate terms with hundreds of digital content creators, collect all the video footage and then license the content in bulk to AI companies. Some AI companies are also working with content creators directly.

“All the companies building video models we’re either working with or are in our pipeline right now,” said Marty Pesis, co-founder and chief executive officer of Troveo, which has paid out over US$5mil (RM22.54mil) to creators.

Most deals include terms that prevent AI companies from creating digital replicas of content creators, mimicking exact scenes from their channels, or using footage in a way that could negatively impact a creator’s reputation, said Andrew Graham, head of digital corporate advisory and partnerships for Creative Artists Agency, which has over a dozen clients in talks to strike deals with AI companies.

CAA represents social media stars such as Amelia Dimoldenberg, who has interviewed celebrities like Ryan Reynolds and Sabrina Carpenter on her web series “Chicken Shop Date”, and YouTube shorts creator Alan Chikin Chow, who has over 73 million followers on the platform.

“Our greatest concern as agents is that we are making sure our clients are being appropriately compensated,” Graham said, “but also being appropriately protected, and that their brand is not going to be sullied or put in any sort of compromised situation.” – Bloomberg

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Tech News

How cellphone records, tracking data and a stolen car led to a US murder arrest
Hydro buys remaining shares in Hydrovolt from Northvolt
Billion-pound lawsuit against Apple over App Store opens in UK
iPhone loses global market share with Apple AI absent in China
CES 2025: Robots set to move beyond factory as AI advances
California wildfires: On a screen, devastation
CES 2025: Smart glasses enter new era with sleeker designs, lower prices
This device charges smartphones in a matter of seconds
How employee referrals for tech jobs became a side hustle
Microsoft is now tricking users into thinking Bing search is Google

Others Also Read