Exceptions to double jeopardy protection


A MALAYSIAN citizen, who was convicted in Canada of sexually assaulting dozens of women in Toronto, served out his 24-year sentence and was then deported to Malaysia. Understandably, there were demands from many concerned Malaysians to act against him in order to prevent any repeat of the heinous crimes.

These calls draw our attention to the constitutional prohibition in Article 7(2) against “double jeopardy”. There is also the fact that the offender’s crimes were committed outside our country and outside the jurisdiction of our courts.

Subscribe or renew your subscriptions to win prizes worth up to RM68,000!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , Shad Faruqi , columnist

   

Next In Columnists

Ways to reduce the smoking scourge
Do we need a council of professors?
Final pause before the grind: A look at Premier League teams’ must-haves
Friendship: The family we choose
Robotic surgery: A breakthrough in prostate cancer treatment for younger patients
Our country, our future
Whistleblowing or political moves?
The bullying must stop
Root out cause of continuing cases of bullying
The night Harimau Malaya and Ibrahim got stuck in Senayan

Others Also Read